How it's scored
Public scoring on Aziel Digital Library. Author Aziel Eliab. Two published numbers: the triad (primary) and ZionPattern Solver (secondary). Neither is a guilt verdict or a courtroom finding.
Triad — SPRE × CLCE × PhysLing
When SPRE, CLCE, and PhysLing Review have all run on a record, one combined score is shown first. That is TRIAD_V1, an auditable geometric mean:
combined = (spre_pc × clce_consistency × plr_coherence)1/3
- SPRE — Source Provenance Reliability Engine. How complete and consistent the provenance looks. No guilt verdict.
- CLCE — claim-to-claim consistency (AZ-CLCE). Triple agreement when it is strong; otherwise pairwise average.
- PhysLing — physics coherence mixed with linguistic neutrality.
Equal one-third weight. Display is round(combined × 100). Component scores stay stored for audit. The unranked Bayesian peer number is not inside this mean and never sorts the shelf.
See a record page, or GET /v1/review?record_id=, for the live triad and lights.
ZionPattern Solver — honest reading
Every Aziel Library and Corpus upload also gets a ZionPattern Solver score. It is public, stored on the record, and returned by review. It is not merged into the triad. Provisional and assistive. It does not solve cases.
A published reading of 75 is intentional suppression confidence — the ceiling. Lower is more natural: less confidence that a suppression pattern holds. The solver also keeps a 25 uncertainty floor so thin evidence cannot pretend to be certainty in the other direction.
If a later paper supersedes an earlier one and proves a pattern break with first-hand / primary materials only, the succession chain can be force-rescored. Narrative, news, and second-source materials never trigger that path.